Comments on: WordPress 2.0 Upgrade http://webgazette.co.uk/2005/12/28/wordpress-20-upgrade/ Change is the only constant... Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:35:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Ainslie http://webgazette.co.uk/2005/12/28/wordpress-20-upgrade/#comment-161 Ainslie Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:59:42 +0000 http://webgazette.co.uk/2005/12/28/wordpress-20-upgrade/#comment-161 Hi Tom, Same here. I can see the benefit for the non-technical but I am glad there was an off switch. :-) It's the same with most wysiwyg html editors though. Take Front Page for example. Please just take it and never let it return! Loads of bad code and... Well, I could just go on and on. Hi Tom,

Same here. I can see the benefit for the non-technical but I am glad there was an off switch. :-)

It’s the same with most wysiwyg html editors though. Take Front Page for example. Please just take it and never let it return!

Loads of bad code and… Well, I could just go on and on.

]]> By: Tom Bammann http://webgazette.co.uk/2005/12/28/wordpress-20-upgrade/#comment-160 Tom Bammann Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:53:44 +0000 http://webgazette.co.uk/2005/12/28/wordpress-20-upgrade/#comment-160 I agree, I found the WYSIWYG editor awful!! I wasted so much time trying to get it to work!! I agree, I found the WYSIWYG editor awful!! I wasted so much time trying to get it to work!!

]]>