<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE7 Now or Never</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webgazette.co.uk/2006/10/19/ie7-now-or-never/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webgazette.co.uk/2006/10/19/ie7-now-or-never/</link>
	<description>Change is the only constant...</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ainslie</title>
		<link>http://webgazette.co.uk/2006/10/19/ie7-now-or-never/#comment-15443</link>
		<dc:creator>Ainslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webgazette.co.uk/2006/10/19/ie7-now-or-never/#comment-15443</guid>
		<description>It works fine in IE6 normally as can be seen here:

http://themes.wordpress.net/testrun/?wptheme=535

I think it may be due to the positioning of you Google ads. For starters the ad at the top of the page is outside of the body tag and the others in between the posts are too wide for the content area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It works fine in IE6 normally as can be seen here:</p>
<p><a href="http://themes.wordpress.net/testrun/?wptheme=535" rel="nofollow">http://themes.wordpress.net/testrun/?wptheme=535</a></p>
<p>I think it may be due to the positioning of you Google ads. For starters the ad at the top of the page is outside of the body tag and the others in between the posts are too wide for the content area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arild Nygaard</title>
		<link>http://webgazette.co.uk/2006/10/19/ie7-now-or-never/#comment-15442</link>
		<dc:creator>Arild Nygaard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 07:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webgazette.co.uk/2006/10/19/ie7-now-or-never/#comment-15442</guid>
		<description>This being said. How do I get my site to display in IE6 It's ok in FF but not nice in IE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This being said. How do I get my site to display in IE6 It&#8217;s ok in FF but not nice in IE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ainslie</title>
		<link>http://webgazette.co.uk/2006/10/19/ie7-now-or-never/#comment-15079</link>
		<dc:creator>Ainslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webgazette.co.uk/2006/10/19/ie7-now-or-never/#comment-15079</guid>
		<description>Hi Andres,

It is done! No more IE6 for me. Not that I used it or will use IE7 much.

I think it is those ugly hacks that are breaking the few sites I have seen that don't render in IE7.

I think the message to IE users is, "you MUST upgrade" and the message for web developers is "you MUST stop the hacks - only use standards compliant XHTML (or HTML) and CSS". :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andres,</p>
<p>It is done! No more IE6 for me. Not that I used it or will use IE7 much.</p>
<p>I think it is those ugly hacks that are breaking the few sites I have seen that don&#8217;t render in IE7.</p>
<p>I think the message to IE users is, &#8220;you MUST upgrade&#8221; and the message for web developers is &#8220;you MUST stop the hacks - only use standards compliant XHTML (or HTML) and CSS&#8221;. <img src='http://webgazette.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas</title>
		<link>http://webgazette.co.uk/2006/10/19/ie7-now-or-never/#comment-15060</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 02:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webgazette.co.uk/2006/10/19/ie7-now-or-never/#comment-15060</guid>
		<description>I've been running the beta versions for several months, and IE7 is simply better than IE6 - in most ways. It is nowhere near as good as a fully expanded and personalized version of Firefox, but it is definitely a major improvement from the older versions.

Beside the new features (which Firefox and Opera users have had for years) the support for CSS is obviously improved a lot in IE7. Now, if everyone could stick to the web standards and avoid using ugly, non-standard browser-specific hacks, there will be hope for the future of the web!

It is exciting to say these words: I will never use IE6 on my own computer again! (Wow, that felt good...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been running the beta versions for several months, and IE7 is simply better than IE6 - in most ways. It is nowhere near as good as a fully expanded and personalized version of Firefox, but it is definitely a major improvement from the older versions.</p>
<p>Beside the new features (which Firefox and Opera users have had for years) the support for CSS is obviously improved a lot in IE7. Now, if everyone could stick to the web standards and avoid using ugly, non-standard browser-specific hacks, there will be hope for the future of the web!</p>
<p>It is exciting to say these words: I will never use IE6 on my own computer again! (Wow, that felt good&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ainslie</title>
		<link>http://webgazette.co.uk/2006/10/19/ie7-now-or-never/#comment-15045</link>
		<dc:creator>Ainslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webgazette.co.uk/2006/10/19/ie7-now-or-never/#comment-15045</guid>
		<description>Hey Sean, hows it going?

Well I shall use Firefox forever! Or, like it's going to happen, something better comes along.

I have already seen one or two websites that are horribly disfigured in IE7 that even IE6 could do.

The good news is that from what I can see, if you code without hacks, which I try to do, IE7 does seem to work most of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sean, hows it going?</p>
<p>Well I shall use Firefox forever! Or, like it&#8217;s going to happen, something better comes along.</p>
<p>I have already seen one or two websites that are horribly disfigured in IE7 that even IE6 could do.</p>
<p>The good news is that from what I can see, if you code without hacks, which I try to do, IE7 does seem to work most of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seanrox</title>
		<link>http://webgazette.co.uk/2006/10/19/ie7-now-or-never/#comment-15042</link>
		<dc:creator>seanrox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webgazette.co.uk/2006/10/19/ie7-now-or-never/#comment-15042</guid>
		<description>IE7 is still very buggy. I've actually uninstalled it from my machine as well as client machines until they get it working a little better.

I still recommend Firefox or anything else besides IE for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE7 is still very buggy. I&#8217;ve actually uninstalled it from my machine as well as client machines until they get it working a little better.</p>
<p>I still recommend Firefox or anything else besides IE for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.391 seconds -->
